Pages Menu
Categories Menu

Posted by on Nov 9, 2013 in Lawsuits, Personal Injury | 0 comments

Yaz: An Extremely Harmful Birth Control Pill?

Yaz and Yasmin are listed among the most commonly doctor-recommended oral contraceptives worldwide. Both are manufactured by Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, a major pharmaceutical company that operates in more than 50 countries. Some of the company’s products are over-the-counter drugs, veterinary drugs and insect repellents.

The birth control pill Yaz, particularly, was introduced by Bayer in 2006. The pill is able to prevent pregnancy by thwarting eggs to evolve, leaving the spermatozoa without any egg to inseminate.

An advertising campaign that extensively promoted the pill plus a New York Times ad, which dubbed the product as a “quality of life treatment,” due to its further capability to prevent bloating, clear one’s face of acne and relieve women of the depression and anxiety brought about by premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD), besides, of course, its effectiveness in preventing pregnancy, easily made Yaz women’s trusted and favorite birth control pill all across the U.S.

One difference Yaz has from other birth control pills is its content called drospirenone, an improved version of synthetic progesterone. Another is in the number of active or hormone-induced pills, which is 24, and inactive or palliative pills, which is only four (other oral contraceptives have seven inactive pills). The 24 active pills simply increase a woman’s dose of synthetic hormones within a month, while the palliative pills are meant to diminish troublesome symptoms during or just before periods.

Despite the numerous lawsuits regarding Yaz’s side effects, but most especially the death of 23 Canadian women, whose deaths are being blamed on the product, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada still refuse to stop the distribution of Yaz, claiming that the product’s benefits still outweigh the risks associated with it.

Despite Bayer’s claim that Yaz is safe and effective, it has known side effects, which include:

  • Fluctuations from upper breathing infections to high amounts of potassium
  • Headaches, which can be as painful as migraines
  • Contaminations in vaginal yeast and infrequency in vaginal discharge
  • Causation of unstable non-menstrual bleeding
  • Contraction of the stomach, hair loss and weight gain
  • Reduction in sexual drive
  • Anaphylactic reactions (Anaphylaxis is severe type I hypersensitivity in the different systems of the body)
  • Higher risk of liver tumors, liver function disturbances, fluctuations in glucose level (which can result to diabetes), hypertension and blood clots
  • Inflammations, enlargement of the lips and the tongue, swelling of the breasts, breast discharge, itching, breathing difficulty, numbness of the arms and legs, stimulation of bowel disease and unbalanced heart beat, breast soreness and vaginal irritation

Besides its many, different unfavorable side-effects, Yaz is also alleged to cause death. This is why women, especially those nursing or expecting, who plan to use the pill, ought to consult their doctors first about the pill’s safety and appropriate dosage. Your doctor also ought to know of other medications you are taking if you decide to use Yaz.

Read More

Posted by on May 24, 2013 in Lawsuits | 0 comments

Jury Rules for Donald Trump in Hotel Lawsuit

A jury has ruled not to award a cent to an 87-year-old woman who filed a lawsuit claiming she was cheated in a deal she made with Donald Trump.

The lawsuit claimed that Trump lured the financial planner into purchasing two condominiums in 2006 for a total of $500,000 in one of his luxury Chicago hotels with purchase incentives that included a cut of ballroom and meeting room revenue. The suit sought upwards of $1 million in damages.

However, a clause buried deep in the contract they agreed to included a provision that would allow Trump, as the owner of the building, to make changes to the agreement as he saw fit. Trump took full advantage of this and decided to not offer the agreed incentives or any comparable replacements. The woman said she was aware of the clause prior to agreeing to the deal, but believed it was typically used in response to changes in building codes or similar situations. It is her attorney’s assertion that the only reason Trump would make the decision to remove the purchase incentives two years after the agreement was signed is that he was planning to do so the entire time.

The jury disagreed, citing the language used in the agreement, which gave Trump every right to behave the way he did. They also argued that the woman, who has years of experience managing huge sums of money, was savvy enough to understand the risks she was taking.

Read More

Posted by on Apr 24, 2013 in Lawsuits | 0 comments

Vegas Police Department Settles Lawsuit with Street Performers

A pair of Las Vegas street performers have received a $105,000 settlement from the Las Vegas police as a result of a lawsuit they filed. The department issued the settlement believing that the cost of litigation would exceed the cost of settling outside of court and was a vital measure to take in order to avoid tarnishing the department’s reputation.

street performer settlementThe two performers were doing their act in a public area outside of the Venetian Hotel in January of 2010 when they were illegally detained. Police officers handcuffed them, demanded identification, and searched their belongings without a warrant.

A public defender from the Nevada ACLU represented the performers in their case. He stated that the settlement is not so much about the money involved, but serves as a reminder that public spaces are open to expressions that are protected by the first amendment.

The police department hopes that this case will improve the way they interact with and approach street performers throughout the city.


Read More